Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FFC56EE.2020702@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf (Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>) |
Ответы |
Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kurt Roeckx wrote: >For getaddrinfo() it says: > > If the nodename argument is not null, it can be a descriptive name > or can be an address string. If the specified address family is > AF_INET, [IP6] [Option Start] AF_INET6, [Option End] or AF_UNSPEC, > valid descriptive names include host names. If the specified > address family is AF_INET or AF_UNSPEC, address strings using > Internet standard dot notation as specified in inet_addr() are > valid. > > [IP6] [Option Start] If the specified address family is AF_INET6 or > AF_UNSPEC, standard IPv6 text forms described in inet_ntop() are > valid. [Option End] > > >I'm not sure what this really says, but I can read it to either >use the inet_addr() or inet_ntop() behaviour. > > > > I read it to mean that abbreviated forms (via inet_addr()) are OK for AF_INET but not for AF_INET6 (via inet_pton()) Does anyone else read it differently? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: