Re: Portable interpretation of jdbc SQLException for SERIALIZABLE
От | Dave Tenny |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Portable interpretation of jdbc SQLException for SERIALIZABLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FF31C12.40609@comcast.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Portable interpretation of jdbc SQLException for SERIALIZABLE transaction restart? (Dave Tenny <jeffrey.tenny@comcast.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Portable interpretation of jdbc SQLException for SERIALIZABLE
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
FYI, additional testing with the software revs indicated below reveals that the SQLException SQLState is null, and the vendor specific error code is zero. That seems to leave me stuck with interpreting the exception string content (ugh!) unless someone has additional information. Dave Tenny wrote: > I'm getting the following /expected/ exception: > > java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: Can't serialize access due to > concurrent update > > at org.postgresql.core.QueryExecutor.execute(QueryExecutor.java:131) > at > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Connection.ExecSQL(AbstractJdbc1Connection.java:505) > > at > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.execute(AbstractJdbc1Statement.java:320) > > at > org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.execute(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:48) > > at > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.executeUpdate(AbstractJdbc1Statement.java:197) > > at > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.executeUpdate(AbstractJdbc1Statement.java:183) > > at DbMutex.updateRow(DbMutex.java:70) > at DbMutex.run(DbMutex.java:38) > > So I know I need to restart my transaction. What I don't know > is how to portably interpret this particular SQLException instance as one > that justifies a transaction restart, as opposed to the myriad other > types of SQLExceptions I might get. > > So two questions: > > 1) How do I know this is an exception indicative of the need for a > transaction restart in PostgreSQL? > 2) How do I do this portably? (I.e. in a database neutral fashion). > > The Sun spec on SQLException talks about XOPEN SQLstate interpretation, > I'm still looking for documentation on that puppy. It also talks > about SQL99. > At this point I'm unsure which applies to this exception for postgresql. > > I'm using PostgreSQL 7.3.3 and Java 1.4.2 on linux, though hopefully > none of that > makes a difference. > > Thanks for any tips. >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: