Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>Sorry, I was busy with work and web site RTL and could not answer before.
>
>
>
>>- A good short description is missing, just two sentences before Latest
>>news" starts.
>>
>>
>
>Feel free to submit anything. The interest of a short description is that it
>can be registered on search engines.
>
>
>
>>- Change Log references CVS HEAD, while we should show the trunk's
>>CHANGELOG.txt
>>
>>
>
>Does it mean we need two changelogs: one for stable, one for snapshots?
>
>
We already have in cvs.
>
>
>>- We should fix up pgAdmin3 naming. pgAdmin3 is just for internal use;
>>for all public purposes we should stick to pgAdmin III rigorously.
>>Unfortunately, this fix will break all translations.
>>
>>
>
>OK, but what happens when pgAdmin 3.1 comes along?
>
>
It's
pgAdmin III 1.0.2
pgAdmin III 1.1.0
pgAdmin III 2.0.0
...
IMHO the current architecture is so flexible that there's no pgAdmin IV
to be expected in the next years.
Regards,
Andreas