Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
| От | Marek Lewczuk |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3FBA0A86.8000900@lewczuk.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? (Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Użytkownik Shachar Shemesh napisał: > Dave Page wrote: > >> Right, but not having the luxury of time travel (wasn't that removed in >> Postgres95? ;-) ) we can only go by what the majority think. We won't >> know if it's actually right unless we try it. >> >> We could run a survey saying 'would you use PostgreSQL on win32', but >> the chances are that the vast majority of potential win32 users would >> not visit the site to answer that until it became widely know that we do >> support win32, by which time of course it's all a bit moot. >> >> Unless of course, you have other stats that prove that win32 support is >> uninteresting to most people and potential users? >> >> Regards, Dave. >> >> > I'm sorry if I'm being alow here - is there any problem with running a > production server on cygwin's postgresql? Is the cygwin port of lesser > quality, or otherwise inferior? Performance, performance, perfomance... and perfomance... it is (almost) always worse perfomance when we emulate something... and using Cygwin we are emulating U*nix...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: