Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FB96F06.7000205@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > If Win32 actually makes it into 7.5 then yes I believe 8.0 would be > appropriate. It might be interesting to track Oracle's version number viz. its feature list. IOW, a PostgreSQL 8.0 database would be feature equivalent to an Oracle 8.0 database. That would mean: 1) PITR 2) Distributed Tx 3) Replication 4) Nested Tx 5) PL/SQL Exception Handling IMHO, a major version number jump should at least match the delta in features one finds in the commercial segment with their major version number bumps. Otherwise, I suspect it would be viewed as window dressing... Could be wrong, though... Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: