Re: DOMAIN usability
От | Rajesh Kumar Mallah |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DOMAIN usability |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FB51B46.3080708@trade-india.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DOMAIN usability (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: DOMAIN usability
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Yes i realize so. But what could be in principle wrong to allow increasing
storage size only eg varchar(30) to varchar(100) not integer to varchar(100)
etc. I remeber there was already a long thread of discussion on it.
BTW: Searching on archives.postgresql.org takes ages is it using FTS?
Regds
Mallah.
Rajesh Kumar Mallah writes:*1.* Suppose varchar(30) turns out to be too small oneday and we want to increase it to varchar(100) , what do i do ?This is no different from the problem of changing a column type in place. It's still being worked on.
Yes i realize so. But what could be in principle wrong to allow increasing
storage size only eg varchar(30) to varchar(100) not integer to varchar(100)
etc. I remeber there was already a long thread of discussion on it.
BTW: Searching on archives.postgresql.org takes ages is it using FTS?
thanks.*2.* Its difficult to see all the constraint defs on a domain . information_schema.domain_constriants does not have the definations just the names are present.You need to join domain_constraints and check_constraints.
Regds
Mallah.
-- Rajesh Kumar Mallah, Infocom Network Limited, New Delhi phone: +91(11)6152172 (221) (L) ,9811255597 (M) Visit http://www.trade-india.com , India's Leading B2B eMarketplace.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: