Hello,
It is my experience that it is only us geeks (read programmers) that
really hate html email. The majority of
people out there don't know or care about the difference.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi Aleksander,
>
> Yep, there's no professional IT person that I know of that uses HTML
> email. Most consider it *rude* to be sent HTML email, or that the
> person sending it was clueless (or made a mistake in their settings
> somehow).
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Aleksander,
>>>
>>>
>>>> I understend your concerns, but looking through my inbox I can see
>>>> that
>>>> everyone, except a small number of fellow programmers, is using
>>>> html format
>>>> for sending messges. It seems to be the standard here and plaintext
>>>> messages are pretty much out of the question for business
>>>> communication.
>>>> I'm not kidding - sometimes I even get asked why I keep replying in
>>>> plaintext! :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, different from here, then. In California, plaintext is still the
>>> standard for anything but advertisements.
>>
>>
>>
>> Same here ... my spam filters pick up nicely on HTML email and
>> shuffle it
>> off to where its supposed to ... no mans land :)
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
> your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC - S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming, shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL.Org - Editor-N-Chief - http://www.postgresql.org