Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FB1B013.8090202@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Justin Clift wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Hmmm .... >> >>>True, but that doesn't take away from Joshua's point at all. He is >>>accurate that MySQL is GPL, and it would live on. Their interested >>>install base is large enough to establish a new developer community if >>>the MySQL company went belly up too. >> >> SO it would be more relevant to say that "it's a single-company project, which >> can and has introduced feature and licensing changes without consideration >> for the greater community." ? > > Ouch. > > But yep, I'd say that's accurate too. Agreed, very big ouch ... they do with the code, the license and everything else whatever they think is best for their revenue. The reason why this had worked so far is that they successfully prevented the building of any open source developer community. A database today is not a product, it is a tool. Customers don't buy a database, they buy a solution, and the database used inside of that solution might require a license, they don't care ... the decision makers are the guys with the ties and (if they aren't overpaid) they look for the cost of ownership of the complete solution, not the pieces. The fine difference between databases and the other tools like build environment, sourcecontrol, compiler and so on is, that the most important part of the database is the runtime component - the server. And that is the very piece where MySQL tries to keep the strong grip. They love to tell everyone that they have a huge user community and that they have many contributors - and they will deny a hundred times that there is a difference between implementing a stored procedure system and a little fix in the JDBC driver. Yet they will insist that you sign over the copyright for the former, or it cannot be added to the distribution, sorry. And they can just make that decision because they have total control over the source code repository. I think this little point about the copyrights and who gets the bucks for the licenses was the source for the MySQL/NuSphere (aka PeerDirect) divorce ... but I might have misunderstood something there. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: