Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FB0B7CB.2070602@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two. (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I think this is the patch I like. It does the auto-detect handling as I > hoped. I will just do the doc updates to mention it. > > My only issue is that this is per-connection, while I think you have to > create a global variable that defaults to false, and on first connect, > check, and not after. Based on the code below, a second connection > would have the SIGPIPE signal set to SIG_IGN, not SIG_DEF, and you > would be back to setting SIG_IGN around each send, even though it was > already set. > > Are others OK with this too? I believe that the are some errors on the following code: #if !defined(HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS) { pqsigfunc old; old = signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); if (old != SIG_DFL) conn->do_sigaction = false; signal(SIGPIPE, old); } #else { struct sigaction oact; if (sigaction(SIGPIPE, NULL, &oact) == 0 && oact.sa_handler != SIG_DFL) conn->do_sigaction = false; } #endif /* !HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS */ the old signal handler is not reinstated in case of HAVE_POSIX_SIGNAL May be this sound better: #if !defined(HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS) { pqsigfunc old; old = signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); if (old != SIG_DFL && old != SIG_ERR) conn->do_sigaction = false; if ( old != SIG_ERR ) signal(SIGPIPE, old); } #else { struct sigaction oact; int err; if ( (err = sigaction(SIGPIPE, NULL, &oact)) == 0 && oact.sa_handler != SIG_DFL) conn->do_sigaction = false; if ( err == 0 ) sigaction(SIGPIPE, &oact, NULL); } #endif /* !HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS */ Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: