Re: Committing Resources to Win32
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FAB7289.7070702@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Committing Resources to Win32
Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli wrote: > >Hello there, > > > >> I have arranged to have 1 full time dedicated programmer to the Win32 >> >> >port. > >That's fantastic. I've been trying to arrange the same thing at my >company... > > > I agree, it's great. > > >> Specifically, I believe and through conversations with several Win32 >> >> >programmers I know, that using create process is a bad idea and that we >should move to a threaded model (at least for Win32). > >CreateProcess appears to be the method the core developers have decided >upon. Unfortunately, and speaking from experience, unless either the >decision to use MingW as a build environment is reviewed (as opposed to >VC++, for instance), or MingW "soon" supports thread local storage >declspecs, a threaded implementation would be just too difficult to >integrate cleanly with the existing source base. > > > The requirement is that we can build with opensource tools. I'm quite prepared to buy the (cheap version of) VC++, but only as a last resort. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: