Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FA8F7F8.1070602@myrealbox.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the performance like compared to PostgreSQL? (Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Paul Ganainm wrote: > Does Interbase/Firebird have (as far as people here are concerned) any > show-stoppers in terms of functionality which they do have on > PostgreSQL? Or, indeed, the other way round? Personally I think native windows port is plus that interbase/firebird has over postgresql. It also has native threaded model which *could* be benefitial at times. I combed docs once or twice. It looks like the linux/unix support is failry new so I don't know how it stacks in production and performance. OTOH, I don't like storing entire database in one file. That could get messy. Otherwise two databases are on par, at least on paper. I hope SQL compliance of interbase/firebird is better than mysql and closer to postgresql, +/- delta. Of course PG has it's own goodies. Rules/Create language are just tip of iceberg. Can you come up with some relative comparison? We can help you from postgresql side..:-) That would be great. Bye Shridhar
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: