Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F9E0BE8.20603@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>Only regproc adds the unnecessary pg_catalog. qualification, why is that? > > > Er, I couldn't see the part of your example where that happened? Basically, my question is why ::regproc alone always addes the catalogue qualification in this case? Rows below correspond to: ::regtype ::regtype ::regprocedure ::regproc -[ RECORD 1 ]---------------------------------------- castsource | "char" casttarget | text castfunc | text("char") castfunc2 | pg_catalog.text eg. Why is it not: -[ RECORD 1 ]---------------------------------------- castsource | "char" casttarget | text castfunc | text("char") castfunc2 | text Or even: -[ RECORD 1 ]---------------------------------------- castsource | pg_catalog."char" casttarget | pg_catalog.text castfunc | pg_catalog.text("char") castfunc2 | pg_catalog.text Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: