Re: pgadmin3 debian package proposal
От | Andreas Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgadmin3 debian package proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F9BB707.6080402@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgadmin3 debian package proposal ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgadmin3 debian package proposal
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> >Side by side. Mmmm, if we're talking side by side right back to CVS, we really ought to be sure we want to do this. Basicallywe'd be committing to maintaining our own wx fork indefinately. Moving back to the standard distro might not beso easy in the future... > > No, I don't want it put into cvs, except for some custom makefiles maybe. We should stay with the current way of syncing our snapshot with wx from time to time, hoping for an age where we can get back to vanilla wx. >That said, a single build system really would be nice. > If we have wx in a subdirectory of our source tree top side by side to src, the make process can do it in a single build. In this case, we wouldn't need to have wx installed, thus minimizing the chance of interference with an official wx package. Regards, Andreas
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: