Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris
От | Josh Wilmes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F995FE0.3090708@cisco.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris
Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Josh Wilmes wrote: > >>Nope, __solaris__ is not defined on our system either. > > > I thought our configure defined __portname__ for every platform, but I > don't see that anywhere, so it seems we rely on the compiler to supply > defines for the cpu and OS. > > Does src/tools/ccsym show you your defines? I would like to have > something that identifies Solaris rather than something that checks for > ISM so that if the ISM define isn't found, we throw an error and we hear > about it. That would be preferable- i didn't know what was safe to assume would always be defined. ccsym is pretty neat. Here's what it shows (gcc) __GNUC__=2 __GNUC_MINOR__=95 sparc sun unix __svr4__ __SVR4 __sparc__ __sun__ __unix__ __svr4__ __SVR4 __sparc __sun __unix system=unix system=svr4 __GCC_NEW_VARARGS__ cpu=sparc machine=sparc
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: