Re: Recomended FS
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Recomended FS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F982AAF.3010500@paradise.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Recomended FS ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Recomended FS
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Its worth checking - isn't it ? I appeciate that you may have performed such tests previously - but as hardware and software evolve its often worth repeating such tests (goes away to do the suggested one tonight). Note that I am not trying to argue away the issue about write caching - it *has* to increase the risk of database corruption following a power failure, however if your backups are regular and reliable this may be a risk worth taking to achieve acceptable performance at a low price. regards Mark scott.marlowe wrote: > >Assuming that the caching was on, I'm betting your database won't survive >a power plug pull in the middle of transactions like the test I put up >above. > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: