Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F903B70.1040001@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark wrote: > Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@libertyrms.info> writes: > >>VACUUM is like putting an extra few transport trucks onto the highway. >>It may only go from one highway junction to the next, and be fairly >>brief, if traffic is moving well. But if traffic is heavy, it adds to >>the congestion. (And that's as far as the analogy can go; I can't >>imagine a way of drawing the GUC parameter into this...) > > Ooh strained metaphors. This game is always fun. > > So I think of it the other way around. A busy database is like downtown > traffic with everyone going every which way for short trips. Running vacuum is > like having a few trucks driving through your city streets for through > traffic. > > Having a parameter to slow down the through traffic is like, uh, having > express lanes for local traffic. er, yeah, that's the ticket. Except who ever > heard of having express lanes for local traffic. Hm. All I know is that Jan Wieck would have each car filled to the brim with spikes.... Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: