Re: comments on casts
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: comments on casts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F8B9C56.5050000@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: comments on casts (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: comments on casts
Re: comments on casts |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> regression=# select oid from pg_cast; > oid > ------- > 16420 > 16421 > 16422 > 16423 > 16424 > ... etc ... > > It would be a very serious design error if pg_cast didn't have OIDs, > because then pg_cast entries couldn't have dependency entries in > pg_depend. OK. Weird. I could have _sworn_ I tried that and I didn't get an OID column. Oh well - makes things a lot easier. Also, with the pg_largeobject table, there seems to be no 'owner' concept on lobs at all. So is there no problem with any random gumby commenting on anyone else's large object? Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: