Re: Open 7.4 items
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Open 7.4 items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F817026.8000204@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Open 7.4 items (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> Oh, that makes me feel better. Do we have timings for this code? > > This is just a single data point, but I made a table of 1 million > rows containing just the int4 primary key column (values 0-1million > in a somewhat random order). Then I copied the same data, sans index, > to produce a foreign key table. Then I tried ALTER ADD PRIMARY KEY. > > The results were: > > Time to load the 1 million rows: 8 sec > > Time to create the PK index: 10 sec > > Time to ADD PRIMARY KEY: > > with CVS-tip code (fire trigger per row): 78 sec > > with proposed patch: anywhere from 5 to 25 sec depending on plan > > The default plan if there is no index on the FK table (meaning the > planner will not know its true size) is a nestloop with inner index > scan taking about 17 sec. Does an ANALYZE run between index creation and bulk FK checking improve planning? It's not doing a full DB scan, so it shouldn't do too much harm, does it? Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: