Re: Server recommendations
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Server recommendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F810F15.6090901@persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Server recommendations (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Server recommendations
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Ron Johnson wrote: >>IMO they could be better machine for databases. Get a 64 bit linux kernel and >>run 32 bit postgresql on it. Should work like a charm.. > > > Why not run 64-bit PG on the 64-bit kernel? A bunch of distros > are releasing support for the AMD64 this month. The best performance is by running 32 bit applications on 64 bit kernel/hardware , according to a migration guide by HP. The reasoning is using space optimally Imagine, if every long in pg is 8byte that would be waste most of the times. However given a native 8 byte integer/float is available, there is no reason to use a 8 byte data type unless required. Its about exploiting wide and fast bus of a 64bit machine in a most optimal fashion. I think except for kernel and glibc, nothing else requires 64 bit in general unless application insists on doing it's own caching. Of course benchmarks have the last words..:-) Shridhar
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: