Re: more i18n/l10n issues

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Dave Page writes:
>
>  
>
>>I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature or tweak for
>>pgAdmin we usually have to fight tooth & nail to justify getting it
>>committed (which is not a bad thing), however 'some guys at Red Hat' are
>>getting switches added to the postmaster without any discussion?
>>    
>>
>
>It was not a nice thing to do.
>
>Could whoever is responsible for this admin tool at Red Hat please specify
>exactly what data they need out of this interface, so we have a chance to
>make the interface a little more future-proof now and possibly remove some
>of the unneeded clutter that is giving translators problems?  Surely that
>would be in everyone's interest, because if we're already set on changing
>the feature again pretty soon, it won't do that admin tool much good.
>
I'm just wondering what this new admin tools is about, what's so 
different about it compared to existing ones making the re-invention of 
the wheel necessary...

Regards,
Andreas

>
>  
>