Re: PL contribution guidelines?
От | mlg7 |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL contribution guidelines? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F758609.000007.20894@tide.yandex.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PL contribution guidelines? (mlg3 <mlg3@mail15.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL contribution guidelines?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > mlg3 writes: > > > I understand that pgsql uses autoconf but not other autotools. > > The best location for such contribution is in > > src/pl/pl<lang-name> > > > > Now, how do I include my PL into the build list? > > What files must I provide? (preferrably, by borrowing > > them from another PL, e.g. PLPERL or TCL]) > > There is currently some disagreement about whether every now procedural > language implementation should be included in the core distribution. If > you choose to distribute your package separately, you can take a look at > http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/plsh.html as an example for how to > package it. 1) Is there a centralized list of pgsql PL's ? 2) At that URL, I see: pgplsh-1.0-7.3.tar.gz 17-Dec-2002 19:17 244k GZIP compressed docume> pgplsh-20010821.tar.gz 23-Sep-2002 18:08 99k GZIP compressed docume> pgplsh-20010914.tar.gz 23-Sep-2002 18:08 101k GZIP compressed docume> pgplsh-20011005.tar.gz 23-Sep-2002 18:08 102k GZIP compressed docume> which version should I prefer? What is the difference between them?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: