Re: Postgresql 'eats' all mi data partition
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql 'eats' all mi data partition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F755762.7050604@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql 'eats' all mi data partition (Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql 'eats' all mi data partition
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tomas Szepe wrote: >>[tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] >> >> >>>indexes: >>>stats_min_pkey primary key btree (ip, "start") >>>stats_min_start btree ("start") >>>stats_hr_pkey primary key btree (ip, "start") >>>stats_hr_start btree ("start") >> >>>ip is of type "inet" in all tables. >>>start is of type "timestamp without time zone" in all tables. >> >>Okay, so a pkey index entry will take 32 bytes counting overhead ... >>you've got about 10:1 bloat on the stats_min indexes and 2:1 in stats_hr. >>Definitely bad :-( > > > The only difference between the way stats_min and stats_hr are updated > stems from the fact that stats_min only holds records for the last 1440 > minutes (because of its killer time granularity), whereas stats_hr > holds its data until we decide some of it is obsolete enough and > issue a "delete from" by hand. Are you sure that all indexes are needed and that a partial index could not help ? What about the statistics on these indexes ? Are they really used ? Regards Gaetano Mendola.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: