Re: 7.4beta2 vs 7.3.3
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.4beta2 vs 7.3.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F6C2B88.8020308@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.4beta2 vs 7.3.3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 7.4beta2 vs 7.3.3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com> writes: > >>The select take long: >>Postgres7.3.3: average 4000 ms >>Postgres7.4b2: average 2600 ms >>you can experiment your self with the dump that I gave you > > > Hm. I tried to duplicate your results. I'm getting about 5400 msec > versus 4200 msec, which is a nice version-to-version improvement but > not as large as you're seeing. (I have --enable-cassert on, though, > and that may be cancelling some of the percentage gain.) May be, I have the --enable-cassert off. What about the wrong row expected ? Anyway if the rows expected are 400 ( instead of 43 ) why not an index scan, with 400 rows on 1500000 seems a good choise do an index scan, isn't it ? Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: