Re: New thoughts about indexing cross-type comparisons
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New thoughts about indexing cross-type comparisons |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F67CB05.95D094CE@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | New thoughts about indexing cross-type comparisons (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Dave Smith <dave.smith@candata.com> writes: > > If this is only dealing with constants, why not just explicitly add a > > cast to the constant of the column type at the planner level. It would > > solve this problem as well ... > > > create table test (f int2); > > select * from test where f=cast('1981928928921' as int2); > > ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "1981928928921": Numerical result out of > > range > > > select * from test where f=1981928928921; > > f > > --- > > (0 rows) > > Uh, your own example points out why we can't just insert a cast to int2 > --- it changes the results. Or am I missing your point? Because PG doesn't have the functionality to catch exceptions until now, we can't call cast functions tentatively. But for example, why should the pg_atoi error cause an unrecoverable error immediately ? IMHO we should be able to call cast functions internally without an anxiety to cause an unrecoverable error. regards, Hiroshi Inouehttp://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: