Re: massive quotes?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: massive quotes? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F61E9C8.9020206@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: massive quotes? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > >>I'd like to see pg_dump use this mechanism for quoting, at least for >>function bodies. I guess it could retrieve the text and then keep >>generating delimiters until it found one that didn't occur inside the >>text. >> >> > >Right, that was what I had in mind. > > great > > >>Maybe for that purpose we could allow underscores as well as >>letters - I don't think that should introduce any extra ambiguities. >>Alternatively, or as well, maybe leading and trailing digits could be >>disallowed, but embedded digits could be allowed. IOW let's be as >>liberal as possible without breaking things. >> >> > ><shrug> I'd prefer to keep the rules as simple as possible. No >particular objection to underscores, but allowing digits in only some >places seems confusing. > > > We already do - you can't begin an identifier with a digit. I'm not dogmatic about it, though. I'd be more than happy with just what you proposed. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: