Re: The ..... worm
От | Dennis Gearon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The ..... worm |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F60B2AD.2050700@fireserve.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The ..... worm ("Keith G. Murphy" <keithmur@mindspring.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The ..... worm
Re: The ..... worm |
Список | pgsql-general |
Some of these image generating apps are even using a background similar to the color blindness tests. I think even an image recognition program would have a hard time with those. Keith G. Murphy wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 14:12:43 +0200, >> Francois Suter <dba@paragraf.ch> wrote: >> >>> I am not sure this is really going to help, because the e-mail >>> addresses are also harvested from the web-based archives. Still >>> doesn't such a reknowned ML tool as Majordomo have a feature that >>> can hide e-mail addresses (like automatically write them as someone >>> AT any DOT com) in the web archives? >> >> >> >> That isn't a real solution. Any standard way of munging addresses in a >> reversable way will result in spammers writing a tool to extract the >> addresses. So if you don't spammers to get addresses off the web >> archives, >> then you don't want addresses there. >> > Check this out: > > http://nlug.org/listserv.php > > They only show graphical images of the return addresses. You'd have > to use text recognition software to harvest them. > > Don't know what software they use, though; might be homegrown for all > I know. > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: