Re: Vote: Adding flex/bison derived files in WIN32_DEV
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vote: Adding flex/bison derived files in WIN32_DEV |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F607CE8.3070204@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vote: Adding flex/bison derived files in WIN32_DEV (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vote: Adding flex/bison derived files in WIN32_DEV
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: >Because MinGW/Msys doesn't come with flex/bison by default, I have added >those derived files to the WIN32_DEV branch in CVS. It makes it easier >for people to install _just_ MinGW and compile PostgreSQL on Win32. The >branch will live for only 1-2 months until we start 7.5 development. >Those files will not be moved into the main branch. > >Should those files be in WIN32_DEV CVS, or should they be removed, and >require people to install bison/flex on MinGW. Even though they will >be updated infrequently, there is concern about CVS file bloat. > > > I vote for requiring MinGW+flex+bison. On *nix you need a similar combination, so why should MinGW be different? If installing flex and bison on MinGW is too hard you probably shouldn't be building out of CVS, ISTM. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: