Re: Win32 native port
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 native port |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F57C83A.3040008@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Win32 native port ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dann Corbit wrote: >You are making an assumption that the follwing sentence is only valid >under conditions of the first. That is nowhere stated. That connection >is only implied by your interpretation. > > Not at all. the phrase "This means" clearly refers to what went before. >Even a trivial and absurd lawsuit can have disastrous consequences. >Consider SCO verses IBM. > > > Fine. You sit quaking with fear in your boots. I won't. BTW, according to my legal theory *I* own all the code to Postgres. Bizarre? Sure, but don't let that stop you worrying about it. One more thing - there is a Cygwin port of Postgres that *is* linked against Cygwin libraries - I haven't heard anybody suggesting that that has infected us with GPLing the code. Let's get real. andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: