Re: 8 way Intel Xeon system
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8 way Intel Xeon system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F4CA469.27749.32D48FD@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 8 way Intel Xeon system ("Castle, Lindsay" <lindsay.castle@eds.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 27 Aug 2003 at 14:07, Castle, Lindsay wrote: > I'm mainly interested in what I should concentrate on from a > Linux/PostgreSQL config point of view to see if we can take advantage of the > extra CPUs. - Yes it's overkill but this is a piece of surplus hardware we > don't have to buy. First of all whatever you do, add multiple connections using a middle layer. That will keep your CPU busy. Of course there are few things need to be done over single connection but this should help at least in some scenarios. > Perhaps some may say Linux isn't the best option for an 8 CPU server but > this is what I have to work with for reasons we won't get into :-) I think if you can afford a performance benchmark trial, give 2.6.0-testx a try. They should be much better than 2.4.x. > The current usage is along the lines of a few thousands updates spread over > the space of a few hours in the morning then followed by a thousand select > queries to do some reporting. In case of such IO intensive and update/delete heavy load, might be a good idea to move WAL to a separate SCSI channel. I believe merely moving it to another drive would not yield as much boost. > Currently RedHat 9 with PostgreSQL 7.3.2 installed. Get 7.4CVS head. and don't forget to use a autovacuum daemon. It's in contrib dir. HTH Bye Shridhar -- Ogden's Law: The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: