Re: Tests
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F450C9B.6000201@potentialtech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tests (Tomka Gergely <tomka@zeus.gau.hu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tests
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tomka Gergely wrote: > 2003-08-21 ragyogó napján Bill Moran ezt üzente: > > >>Tomka Gergely wrote: >> >>>http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html >>> >>>One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for >>>the Linux/Postgres systems. >>> >>>The four test was: >>> >>>teszt1 - 10.000 inserts >>>teszt2 - 10.inserts, 10 in one trans. >>>teszt3 - 14.000.000 inserts, 1.000 in one trans. >>>teszt4 - "Select count(*)" on the big table. >>> >>>What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time >>>for other test. >> >>It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how >>it stacked up against the others. > > Shame? I smell here a harcore BSD fighter :) Well, I suppose ... > Maybe sometime he run > tests on *SD, but now we need linux data. "He" has had it on his list of things to do for months. And if I ever get enough free moments, I will test *both* BSD and Linux, because I'm terribly biased towards BSD because that's all I use. In addition to being interested in how FreeBSD's ufs+softupdates compares to the variety of Linux journalling filesystems, I'm also interested to compare FreeBSD's performance on ext2fs and FAT to Linux's peformance on those same filesystems. It's a "shame" because I simply haven't found the time yet. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: