Re: [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Pflug
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"
Дата
Msg-id 3F449F62.7020107@pse-consulting.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
Дерево обсуждения 
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:

>On 21 Aug 2003 at 0:22, Ian Barwick wrote:
>
>
>>* DDL
>>- Data definition language (table creation statements etc.) in MySQL
>>are not transaction based and cannot be rolled back.
>>
>>
>
>Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs? oracle seems to
>have autonomous transactions which is arthogonal.
>
M$ SQL2000 has (and previous versions had too, I believe)

Regards,
Andreas

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list
Следующее
От: Manfred Koizar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list