Re: ext3 block size
От | DeJuan Jackson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ext3 block size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F32800C.2040101@speedfc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ext3 block size (Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
It was RH8 where I saw the issues. It was so bad that I had one server freeze 20 minutes after reboot. And it wasn't a hardware issue; that server is now running with several months of uptime under heavy load. Jonathan Bartlett wrote: >What distribution are you running? I and a lot of other people use RH8 on >multiprocesor boxes, and it works great! > >Jon > >On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, DeJuan Jackson wrote: > > > >>Don't know the answer to your question, but I thought I would just pipe >>in and say that if this is an SMP (has multiple processors) Linux box >>you don't want to use ext3!!! >> >>I used ext3 on my SMP box here at work and now I can't have children (I >>guess it would help if I got a wife first)!! >>But in all seriousness SMP + ext3 = BAD(unpredictable crashes depending >>loosely related to system load). >> >> >>Wilson A. Galafassi Jr. wrote: >> >> >> >>>hello. >>>my database size is 5GB. what is the block size recommend? >>>thanks >>>wilson >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: