Re: logging stuff

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: logging stuff
Дата
Msg-id 3F2FEB4E.5010901@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logging stuff  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
It's more work for a very small cosmetic benefit, ISTM. Setting up 
atomic GUC variables is trivially easy, I'm happy to say.  Not that I 
can't write a simple parser, but why bother for something so tiny?

Also, would we be saying (or implying) that the order given on the line 
would affect the output? If so, that could make LOTS more work, again 
for very small benefit, I think.

(Yes, of course this is for 7.5).

cheers

andrew

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>I think we need a more general variable that can take several values,
>separated by commas, like:
>
>    log_line:  dbname,user
>
>or something like that.
>
>In fact, looking at the postgresql.conf file, I see only two setting
>that print on every line:  log_pid and log_timestamp.  Perhaps those two
>should be merged into log_line.
>
>Of course, this is all for 7.5.
>
>  
>




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: