Re: IPv6 in pg_hba.conf.sample fails here
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: IPv6 in pg_hba.conf.sample fails here |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F2ADA4C.8040304@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | IPv6 in pg_hba.conf.sample fails here (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: IPv6 in pg_hba.conf.sample fails here
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Yeah, I'd be very surprised if many need it, and those who do can uncomment it. I think commenting it out is the right thing (tm). andrew Tom Lane wrote: >Testing a connection that should fail (for lack of pg_hba entry): > >$ psql -h sss2 tgl >psql: FATAL: missing or erroneous pg_hba.conf file >HINT: See postmaster log for details. >$ > >Say what? This is with a completely default pg_hba.conf file... >looking in the postmaster log as suggested: > >LOG: could not interpret IP address "::1" in config file: Unknown server error >LOG: invalid entry in pg_hba.conf file at line 55, token "::1" >FATAL: missing or erroneous pg_hba.conf file >HINT: See postmaster log for details. > >In short, it will not do to put IPv6 addresses into pg_hba.conf >by default on machines where IPv6 support is not present. > >While we could gin up some mechanism to adjust the installed copy of >pg_hba.conf.sample depending on whether we detected IPv6 support, >I am inclined to simply remove or comment out the IPv6-specific entry >in the sample file. I doubt that many people actually need it, and >the ones who do can just adjust the sample file. > >Comments? > > regards, tom lane > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: