Re: Views With Unions
От | Rajesh Kumar Mallah |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Views With Unions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F29E12F.7030207@trade-india.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Views With Unions (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Stephan Szabo wrote: >On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Christopher Browne wrote: > > > >> select * from log_table where request_time between 'june 11 2003' and >> 'june 12 2003'; >> >>returns a plan: >>Subquery Scan log_table (cost=0.00..10950.26 rows=177126 width=314) >> -> Append (cost=0.00..10950.26 rows=177126 width=314) >> -> Subquery Scan *SELECT* 1 (cost=0.00..3089.07 rows=50307 width=71) >> -> Seq Scan on log_table_1 (cost=0.00..3089.07 rows=50307 width=71) >> -> Subquery Scan *SELECT* 2 (cost=0.00..602.92 rows=9892 width=314) >> -> Seq Scan on log_table_2 (cost=0.00..602.92 rows=9892 width=314) >> -> Subquery Scan *SELECT* 3 (cost=0.00..2390.09 rows=39209 width=314) >> -> Seq Scan on log_table_3 (cost=0.00..2390.09 rows=39209 width=314) >> >> > >What version are you using? In 7.3 and up it should be willing to >consider moving the clause down, unless there's something like a type >mismatch (because in that case it may not be equivalent without a bunch >more work on the clause). > Dear Chris, I had the same problem(type mismatch) and it was solved finally. check the list "factoring problem ... " subject only 2 weeks back . regds mallah. > > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: