Re: followup on previous

We wouldn't like to have it called Ingres too...
Spoken language is different from written, so docs should be precise. 
PostgreSQL is a mark, and should be used as careful as it deserves.

Regards,
Andreas

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

>I just seem to recall a discussion where we decided to 'standardise' on
>PostgreSQL...I'm not fussed tho.
>
>Chris
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
>To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
>Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
>Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:53 PM
>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] followup on previous
>
>
>  
>
>>Thomas liked Postgres rather than PostgreSQL in the docs, and I think
>>that's where it came from.  I use Postgres in speaking, and PostgreSQL
>>in writing, so I guess either is OK.
>>
>>    
>>