Re: Another exception (Transaction level)
От | Fernando Nasser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Another exception (Transaction level) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F2520A5.6090700@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Another exception (Transaction level) (Ole Streicher <ole-usenet-spam@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Another exception (Transaction level)
Re: Another exception (Transaction level) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Ole Streicher wrote: > > I'd propose to put this information directly into the table - either > by removing the two not supported levels, or by flagging them somehow. > As I've mention before they _are_ supported and as _per standard_. The standard allows implementations to provide a higher isolation level in place of any lower level that is not implemented. These isolation levels are only intended for you to rely on whatever isolation they guarantee, not on what you could be able to see if the isolation protections are not in place. There is no guarantees on what you will be able to see. The comment you are asking for belongs to a book that teaches people SQL. The PostgreSQL manual assumes SQL knowledge (it is stated right at the beginning). Regards, Fernando -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: