Re: 0/1 vs true/false
От | Chris Travers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 0/1 vs true/false |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F1E37B1.8060608@travelamericas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 0/1 vs true/false (Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc@mega-bucks.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: 0/1 vs true/false
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I ran into this problem some time ago. I ended up using a query with a CASE statement in it to caste the boolean as a 1 or 0. I guess one could do this as a view as well. Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote: > Just having a small argument with an application developer ... > > is using 0/1 for boolean types SQL compliant? I am trying to convince > him that the proper SQL compliant (and postgresql compliant) syntax is > true/false but he won't budge ... > > The app as currently written no longer works with postgres because > they code uses 0/1 instead of the now enforced true/false for boolean > types. > > Can someone point me to an SQL spec and section where this is clearly > stated out? > > Thanks, > > Jean-Christian Imbeault > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: