Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and
| От | Mike Mascari |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3F126B2F.8050308@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and oracle/mysql (Jörg Schulz <jschulz@sgbs.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and
Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Jörg Schulz wrote: >>... I have this feeling the reason Oracle gives this result may >>be again because transactions have been switched off! > > This snippet comes from the Oracle console: > (table name is "a" not "test" / messages are in german) > ... > SQL> select * from a; > > A > ---------- > 1 > 3 > 4 > 2 Presumably Oracle is not rolling back a duplicate key violation, allowing the transaction to continue. This is an often requested feature not present in PostgreSQL. Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: