Re: Break referential integrity.
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Break referential integrity. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F0C67BA.2050209@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Break referential integrity. (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Stephan Szabo wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Rudi Starcevic wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I know that if you have a trigger and function then drop/replace the >> function the trigger needs >> to be drop/replaced too so that it can see the new function. >> >> Is it the same for Ref. Integ. on table's too ? >> >> If table B's foreign key references table A and you drop/replace table A >> then the reference from table B to table A is broken and needs to be >> recreated ? > > In recent versions, you should not be drop table A without specifying > cascade which will drop the constraint for you (and thus you'll need to > recreate it). In older versions, I'm not 100% sure what'd happen, but you > probably should drop and recreate it for good measure. Older versions spit out a NOTICE and dropped the constraint, so they kinda defaulted to CASCADE. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: