Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F071179-7CE4-4E07-8D8A-467448BAF581@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Aug 20, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > When you would to ignore result, then you should to use a PERFORM - actually, it is limited now and should be fixed. Haveno problem with it. Glad to have you on board. :-) > I don't would to enable a free unbound statement that returns result. I have no pony in that race. I think it is useful, though I prefer to unit test things enough that I would be fine withoutit. But even without it, there may be times when I want to discard a result in a function that *does* return a value -- likelya different value. So there needs to be a way to distinguish statements that should return a value and those that donot. Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: