Re: Duplicate key insert question
От | Jean-Christian Imbeault |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Duplicate key insert question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F022E34.1040808@mega-bucks.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Duplicate key insert question (Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc@mega-bucks.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Duplicate key insert question
Re: Duplicate key insert question |
Список | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > No, only the "second" one will fail (though it's difficult which one is > the second) From: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postgresql-general&m=105656988915991&w=2 Ian Barwick wrote: [...] I proposed that same solution 3 years ago. Tom shoots it down: [...] I couldn't get the link to work so I couldn't read why Tom shot it down. But if Tom shot down this idea down ... then it mustn't be correct. >>If I followed all the arguments correctly according to the thread there >>is *no* way to do what I (and you ;) want in one simple query. > > > No, there's not. You say no, but at first you say that the proposed method works. The proposed method, if it is correct, is simple enough for me. By simple I mean all can be done with one query. > You should check the returned value from the insertion > function to see if it succeeded or not. No, what I want if to have one query that will *always* insert if there is no record with this primary key and *always* do nothing (not fail, not generate an error) if there is already a record with this primary key. I don't want to check return values :) Thanks, Jean-Christian Imbeault
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: