Re: Missing array support
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing array support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F00F2CC.50501@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missing array support (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>* Using an array as a table source using UNNEST, something like: >>> >>>select * from unnest(test.b); >>>(Check the exact spec to be sure; clause 7.6.) >> >>select * from unnest(array['a','b']); >>?column? >>---------- >> a >> b >> >>select * from unnest(array['a','b']) WITH ORDINALITY; >> ?column? | ?column? >>----------+---------- >> 1 | a >> 2 | b > >>select * from unnest(array['a','b']) as t(f1, f2) WITH ORDINALITY; >> f1 | f2 >>----+---- >> 1 | a >> 2 | b > > The WITH ORDINALITY goes before the AS clause. > > The reason it is defined in terms of the LATERAL clause is that that > allows you to refer to column aliases defined in FROM items to its left. > This is the way variable arguments of function calls as table sources can > be resolved. (At least this is my interpretation. I found some examples > on the web a few months ago about this.) > If I can get this done *without* supporting LATERAL by the end of the evening (i.e. just implement the examples), would it possibly be accepted? Or should UNNEST wait until we get LATERAL? Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: