Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3EF59BEE.7040103@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > BTW, I would not approve of a response along the lines of "can't you > #ifdef to the point that there are no code changes in the Unix builds?" > No you can't, unless you want to end up with an unmaintainable mess > of #ifdef spaghetti. The thing that makes this hard is the tradeoff > between making the code readable and maintainable (which requires > sharing as much code as possible across platforms) vs isolating > platform-specific considerations. Programming at this level is not > a science but an art form, and it's very hard to get it right the first > time --- especially when none of us have access to all the platforms > that the code must ultimately work on. Exactly my point and the reason I am doing the entire fork+exec stuff over again. Bruce nagged me endlessly to commit the broken parts I had and fix them later. I never agreed with that philosophy because in my experience the worst workarounds live forever. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: