Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vivek Khera
Тема Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Дата
Msg-id 3EF41DD8-1073-4EAC-B6D7-4A78BE7549F8@khera.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
Ответы Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (Sven Geisler <sgeisler@aeccom.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Apr 25, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Bill Moran wrote:

> Where I'm stuck is in deciding whether we want to go with dual-core
> pentiums with 2M cache, or with HT pentiums with 8M cache.

In order of preference:

Opterons (dual core or single core)
Xeon with HT *disabled* at the BIOS level (dual or single core)


Notice Xeon with HT is not on my list :-)


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync
Следующее
От: Vivek Khera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs