Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
От | Serge Rielau |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3ECC3C9C-D94F-47DF-B578-909DD1928C23@rielau.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have not clean feeling from this - I am pretty sure so I am afraid schizophrenic between MODULES, SCHEMAS. Nested schemasincrease complexity of searching complexity and breaks a logic database.schema.object Yes my proposal to nest schemata is “radical” and this community is not falling into that camp. But there is nothing holy about database.schema.object.attribute . > > Currently almost all in PostgreSQL PL design is primitive, but that means pretty simple too. We are having > 30,000 functions with a total of millions of lines of code. You are describing a self fulfilling prophecy here. As long as the community codebase only caters to its existing users you will not see a change in the usage pattern of thebase. > It is hard to see a advantages of this proposal. At least I tried :-) Serge
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: