Re: Feature suggestions (long)
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature suggestions (long) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3EC713EF.9000206@paradise.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature suggestions (long) (Matthew Kirkwood <matthew@hairy.beasts.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature suggestions (long)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Matthew Kirkwood wrote: >On Sat, 17 May 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > >>>>I'm going suggest a feature like what Oracle calls "partitions" and later on >>>>something with indexes. The idea is to generate some discussion to see if >>>>they are worthy of being added to the TODO list. >>>> >>>> >>>Why bother? >>> >>> >>Maybe one can put different partitions in different tablespaces? >> >> > >One can. The tablespace a partition is in can even be >offline if Oracle can prove that a query doesn't require >that partition. > > Being able to "segment" tables for admin purposes (like archiving) might be beneficial. I guess this could be orthogonal to clustering or partitioning schemes that mininize table/index access for queries. (Oracle has sort of rolled these ideas together with their partitioning) Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: