Re: "deadlock detected" documentation
От | Matt Mello |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "deadlock detected" documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3EC3C239.7070708@spaceship.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "deadlock detected" documentation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: "deadlock detected" documentation
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:> I can't see a reason for bare UPDATEs of that sort to get deadlocks.> There must be some other factor involved. Do you have triggers, rules,> or foreign keys on this table? Other locks being taken in the same> transaction? We haven't finished implementing our transaction system yet, so no, there are no other things running in the txn. Each of those statements is a complete txn. <blush> This problem only happens on our production server (Murphy's Law). I haven't been able to duplicate it on our test system. The production system is a heavily multi-threaded environment that has lots of data entering the system all the time. This makes it difficult to detect which SQL statements are affecting each other. :( There are no triggers or rules except for the foreign keys. The txn table has several foreign keys. The two that seem to be of interest are: txn.drawerid -> drawer.drawerid txn.batchid -> batch.batchid I certainly don't mind posting a LOT more info on this. I just didn't want to spam the list with useless information. If I understood more about what can cause this kind of error, I could probably find and post the pertinent info. Can I assume that a plain old select has nothing to do with this? If so, I can remove the select's from my log and that will eliminate about 80% of the SQL, making it easier to tell what is happening. Thanks, Tom! -- Matt Mello
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: