Re: > 16TB worth of data question
От | Dennis Gearon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: > 16TB worth of data question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3EA57B25.70701@cvc.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: > 16TB worth of data question (Jeremiah Jahn <jeremiah@cs.earlham.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
One thing to think of, is how much is your REPUTATION worth? If everything you touch, turns to gold, keeps working, raisesand better equipment are a LOT easier to get. OTOH................ Jeremiah Jahn wrote: > On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 11:47, Philip Hallstrom wrote: > >>>On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 10:31, Lincoln Yeoh wrote: >>> >>>>At 08:13 AM 4/22/2003 -0500, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: >>>> >>>>>That's the question...That 2 TB of data is nothing but documents and >>>>>images. I'm under the perception that if that gets parked on a fibre >>>>>channel disk array/ SAN the data will be pretty safe, and the server >>>>>mostly replaceable at that time. Storage is my worry more than >>>>>processing power. I don't think I'm on crack here...? >>>> >>>>How about backups? Backing up 2-16TB needs a bit more planning and design. >>> >>>The proposed solution here is to have the raid controller mirror accross >>>the street to a similar system. At what point do off line backups become >>>pointless? >> >>I've always been told to ask the question -- what's your data worth to >>you or how much $ will you lose if you lose your data? That should answer >>the question on offline backups. >> >>-philip > > > It's for the court system, so not much really. It basically a convience > only. >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: