Re: postgresql and process titles
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql and process titles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E9F8629-1EFE-4790-A885-D84C22286385@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql and process titles (Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 13, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> BTW, there's another FBSD performance odditiy I've run across. >> Running >> >> pg_dump -t email_contrib -COx stats | bzip2 > ec.sql.bz2 & >> >> which dumps the email_contrib table to bzip2 then to disk, the OS >> won't use more than 1 CPU on an SMP system... unless the data is >> cached. According to both gstat and systat -v, the system isn't I/O >> bound; both are reporting the RAID10 with that table on it as only >> about 10% busy. If I let that command run for a bit then cancel it >> and re-start it so that the beginning of that table is in cache, it >> will use one entire CPU for bzip2, which is what I'd expect to >> happen. > > Hmm, odd..maybe something with the scheduler. I'd need access to a > test case to be able to figure it out though. well, pg_dump of any sizeable database piped through bzip2 or gzip should show this. Try: pg_dump large_database | bzip2 > databasedump.sql.bz2 -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: